Quantifying effects in two-sample environmental experiments using bootstrap confidence intervals
نویسندگان
چکیده
Two-sample experiments (paired or unpaired) are often used to analyze treatment effects in life and environmental sciences. Quantifying an effect can be achieved by estimating the difference in center of location between a treated and a control sample. In unpaired experiments, a shift in scale is also of interest. Non-normal data distributions can thereby impose a serious challenge for obtaining accurate confidence intervals for treatment effects. To study the effects of non-normality we analyzed robust and non-robust measures of treatment effects: differences of averages, medians, standard deviations, and normalized median absolute deviations in case of unpaired experiments, and average of differences and median of differences in case of paired experiments. A Monte Carlo study using bivariate lognormal distributions was carried out to evaluate coverage performances and lengths of four types of nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals, namely normal, Student’s t, percentile, and BCa for the estimated measures. The robust measures produced smaller coverage errors than their non-robust counterparts. On the other hand, the robust versions gave average confidence interval lengths approximately 1.5 times larger. In unpaired experiments, BCa confidence intervals performed best, while in paired experiments, Student’s t was as good as BCa intervals. Monte Carlo results are discussed and recommendations on data sizes are presented. In an application to physiological sourceesink manipulation experiments with sunflower, we quantify the effect of an increased or decreased sourceesink ratio on the percentage of unfilled grains and the dry mass of a grain. In an application to laboratory experiments with wastewater, we quantify the disinfection effect of predatory microorganisms. The presented bootstrap method to compare two samples is broadly applicable to measured or modeled data from the entire range of environmental research and beyond. 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Small Sample Properties of Nonparametric Bootstrap t Confidence Intervals
Confidence interval construction for central tendency is a problem of practical consequence for those who must analyze air contaminant data. Determination of compliance with relevant ambient air quality criteria and assessment of associated health risks depend upon quantifying the uncertainty of estimated mean pollutant concentrations. The bootstrap is a resampling technique that has been stead...
متن کاملBootstrap confidence intervals of CNpk for type‑II generalized log‑logistic distribution
This paper deals with construction of confidence intervals for process capability index using bootstrap method (proposed by Chen and Pearn in Qual Reliab Eng Int 13(6):355–360, 1997) by applying simulation technique. It is assumed that the quality characteristic follows type-II generalized log-logistic distribution introduced by Rosaiah et al. in Int J Agric Stat Sci 4(2):283–292, (2008). Discu...
متن کاملStatistical Topology Using the Nonparametric Density Estimation and Bootstrap Algorithm
This paper presents approximate confidence intervals for each function of parameters in a Banach space based on a bootstrap algorithm. We apply kernel density approach to estimate the persistence landscape. In addition, we evaluate the quality distribution function estimator of random variables using integrated mean square error (IMSE). The results of simulation studies show a significant impro...
متن کاملBootstrap confidence intervals for principal response curves
The Principal Response Curve model is of use to analyze multivariate data resulting from experiments involving repeated sampling in time. The time-dependent treatment effects are represented by Principal Response Curves (PRCs), which are functional in nature. The sample PRCs can be estimated using a raw approach, or the newly proposed smooth approach. The generalizability of the sample PRCs can...
متن کاملNew Technical Efficiency Estimates with Improved Bootstrap Confidence Interval Coverage
Bootstrap confidence intervals on fixed-effects efficiency estimates from finite-sample panel data models exhibit low coverage probabilities, because the traditional estimate involves a "max" operator that induces a finite sample bias. Attempts to bootstrap confidence intervals for the traditional estimate have focused on correcting bias. Rather than addressing this bias at the bootstrap stage,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Environmental Modelling and Software
دوره 22 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007